<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PGP Mediation &#187; ethics opinions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pgpmediation.com/category/ethics-opinions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pgpmediation.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 02:00:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>AM I STEPPING OVER THE LINE?</title>
		<link>http://www.pgpmediation.com/2010/07/16/am-i-stepping-over-the-line/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pgpmediation.com/2010/07/16/am-i-stepping-over-the-line/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 14:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phyllis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ethics opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mediation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scrivener]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[settlement agreement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pgpmediation.com/?p=1705</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When the parties settle a matter at mediation, I am usually very happy about it. But, I am also conflicted because the settlement creates issues internally that I have yet to resolve.
Usually, once the parties settle, they want to document it and leave very quickly. But often, they have not brought a settlement agreement with [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pgpmediation.com/2010/07/16/am-i-stepping-over-the-line/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>THE DILEMNA OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION</title>
		<link>http://www.pgpmediation.com/2009/06/26/the-dilemna-of-confidential-information/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pgpmediation.com/2009/06/26/the-dilemna-of-confidential-information/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 16:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phyllis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ethics opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confidentiality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free and informed choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mediation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[model standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quality of the process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reality testing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pgpmediation.com/?p=703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[       In many mediations, I have faced the dilemma in which one side provides crucial but confidential information to me in a separate session (i.e. caucus), admonishing me “not to tell the other side.” I sense that the information is extremely relevant and may make the difference in reaching a settlement. But, I know “my [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pgpmediation.com/2009/06/26/the-dilemna-of-confidential-information/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WALKING A FINE LINE</title>
		<link>http://www.pgpmediation.com/2009/03/20/walking-a-fine-line/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pgpmediation.com/2009/03/20/walking-a-fine-line/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 16:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phyllis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ethics opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorneys fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impartiality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mediation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Model standards of Conduct for Mediators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quality of the process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self-determination]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pgpmediation.com/?p=508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[       Ah! Attorney’s Fees. Where would the litigated case be without them. To a plaintiff, the ideal situation is one in which defendant pays the fees of plaintiff’s counsel, either as a result of a fee-shifting statute or a contingency fee agreement.
     
        But, such an arrangement poses a quandary for the mediator who is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pgpmediation.com/2009/03/20/walking-a-fine-line/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

