<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PGP Mediation &#187; lemon law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pgpmediation.com/category/lemon-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pgpmediation.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:00:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>ATTENDING BY TELEPHONE</title>
		<link>http://www.pgpmediation.com/2012/01/20/attending-by-telephone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pgpmediation.com/2012/01/20/attending-by-telephone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 14:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phyllis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[lemon law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[life's lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mediation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reality check]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Song Beverly Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telephone mediaiton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pgpmediation.com/?p=2507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[            Although the general consensus among neutrals is that the parties to a dispute should attend the mediation in person, at the same time, I have successfully mediated disputes in which one or more or all involved have attended by telephone. Indeed, I have conducted several mediations solely via telephone with success: the cases settled.
            Yet, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pgpmediation.com/2012/01/20/attending-by-telephone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>THE CADILLAC IS A LEMON</title>
		<link>http://www.pgpmediation.com/2010/02/10/the-cadillac-is-a-lemon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pgpmediation.com/2010/02/10/the-cadillac-is-a-lemon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 14:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phyllis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[True court cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lemon law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Song  Beverly Consumer Warranty Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prejudgment interest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pgpmediation.com/?p=1394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On February 4, 2010, the California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, issued its opinion in Lukather v. General Motors, LLC, Case No. B209979. (Lukather v. GM ) Because this is a “lemon law” case, it caught my interest. (I conduct a lot of “lemon law” mediations.)
Plaintiff’s story unfolds as follows:
On April 25, 2005, Paul [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pgpmediation.com/2010/02/10/the-cadillac-is-a-lemon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>$250K LAMBORGHINI A LEMON</title>
		<link>http://www.pgpmediation.com/2009/08/20/250k-lamborghini-a-lemon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pgpmediation.com/2009/08/20/250k-lamborghini-a-lemon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 06:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phyllis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[lemon law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pgpmediation.com/?p=839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A judge declared that a mysterious noise makes a man&#8217;s $250,000 Lamborghini a lemon. KNXV&#8217;s Christopher Sign reports.
Embedded video from &#38;lt;a href=&#8221;http://www.cnn.com/video&#8221; mce_href=&#8221;http://www.cnn.com/video&#8221;&#38;gt;CNN Video&#38;lt;/a&#38;gt;
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pgpmediation.com/2009/08/20/250k-lamborghini-a-lemon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>THE LONG LIFE OF AN IMPLIED WARRANTY</title>
		<link>http://www.pgpmediation.com/2009/07/10/the-long-life-of-an-implied-warranty/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pgpmediation.com/2009/07/10/the-long-life-of-an-implied-warranty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phyllis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case examples]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lemon law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[implied warranty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[implied warranty of merchantability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SONG-BEVERLY CONSUMER WARRANTY ACT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pgpmediation.com/?p=724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[        What is the duration of the implied warranty of merchantability under California’s Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act (Civil Code §1790 et seq.) (“The Song-Beverly Act”)? Is its duration simply as set forth in Civil Code § 1791.1(c):
      “The duration of the implied warranty of merchantability. . . shall be coextensive in duration with an express [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pgpmediation.com/2009/07/10/the-long-life-of-an-implied-warranty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>“THE BENTLEY IS A LEMON”</title>
		<link>http://www.pgpmediation.com/2009/06/19/the-bentley-is-a-lemon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pgpmediation.com/2009/06/19/the-bentley-is-a-lemon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 16:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phyllis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lemon law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discovery abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[express warranty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[implied warranty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[misuse of disovery process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prejudgment interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SONG-BEVERLY CONSUMER WARRANTY ACT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pgpmediation.com/?p=680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As many of my readers are aware, I mediate “lemon law” cases or matters brought under California’s Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act (Civ. Code §1790 et seq.). (“Song-Beverly Act”).
On June 8, 2009, Division Three of the Fourth Appellate District (i.e. Orange County) for the Court of Appeal of the State of California decided two appeals involving [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pgpmediation.com/2009/06/19/the-bentley-is-a-lemon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

