Archive for the 'life's lessons' Category

HAPPY HOLIDAYS !

Wednesday, December 23rd, 2009

       Because this is my last blog for this year (I will return in early January 2010), I have been pondering what to write about. I wanted it to  be inspiring and memorable. I wanted to end this year on a high note.

       Then – it dawned on me: Simplicity is best – keep it simple.

       So. . . I want to wish every one of you a very happy holiday and the warmest of wishes for a healthy and prosperous 2010.

       I know that 2009 has been a very difficult year for everyone. Especially because of the times, I want to thank each of you for allowing me to mediate your matters. I truly appreciate and am deeply grateful for your continuous support and trust during 2009 . Because of you, my mediation practice has been successful. I have met a lot of great people and have learned a lot from each of you. I only hope that I have  been able to enrich your lives as much as you have enriched mine. Thank you!

      I also want to thank my blog readers for your support. I have met some wonderful people in cyberspace  and have been privileged to even meet  some of them in person.  I wish each of my cyber friends a very warm holiday and a  very happy 2010. I know it will be a good year for all of us.

       May 2010 bring each of you peace and joy and  easy resolutions to all of your disputes.

       Happy Holidays and Happy 2010! 

       …. Just a lot to think about!….

WHAT HAS THE WORLD COME TO?

Friday, December 18th, 2009

      I am a member of the Louisiana State Bar. Like most states, the Louisiana Bar  requires that its active non-exempt members take so many hours of continuing education each year, including courses on “Professionalism”. As a result, I get e mails advertising courses from time to time. 
 

      Recently, I received the following e mail advertisement. It troubled me. It really made me stop, think and wonder what the legal world is coming to. Sadly, I am also a member of the California Bar which is the object of this article:   

      “More than 600 soon-to-be lawyers were taking the California State Bar exams in the Pasadena Convention Center when a 50-year-old test-taker suffered a heart attack. Only fellow candidates John Leslie and Eunice Morgan stopped to help the man. They administered CPR until paramedics arrived, then resumed taking the test. Citing policy, the test supervisor refused to allow the helpers any additional time to make up for the 40 minutes they spent helping the victim. Jerome Braun, the State Bar’s senior executive for admissions, backed the decision stating, “If these two want to be lawyers, they should learn a lesson about priorities.”

      “Against this kind of backdrop, it’s no wonder that, for some of us, the line between winning and waging war is blurred. Clever rebuttals can slip into verbal abuse, zealous advocacy becomes incivility, and the thrill of victory can turn into battle fatigue. In this course, Dr. Johnston takes a look at the role stress plays in incivility and how attorneys can channel the emotional energy of litigation into appropriate, constructive behavior.”

        This is a sad commentary on the state of  the legal world in California. The fact that it is being noted by a provider of training in Louisiana (CLE Compliance – DigiLearn) (approximately 2000 miles away via Interstate 10) is really troublesome. What Mr. Braun did is, obviously, well known throughout the country, and California’s reputation is clearly  tarnished as a result.

       This episode  epitomizes why I gave up the practice of law and became a full time mediator; I am into peace making, not battle fatigue. I am into resolving matters using  a “win-win” approach; not “I win and you lose” or zero sum game approach. There is no thrill in victory for me. The thrill for me is in helping people settle their disputes; when I succeed, I feel that I have done some good in the world that day.

      I share this story with you to show why mediation is so valuable in our society. By using mediation to resolve a dispute, a party avoids the verbal abuse, the over zealous advocacy  and the general incivility in civil litigation. Yes, civil litigation can be quite uncivil these days.

      As you ponder this story and its implications and ramifications, I would like to  leave you with a wish for a very Happy Holiday and a wonderful New Year. Surely, 2010 will be a better year for all of us. 

      . . .Just something to think about.

If you enjoy this blog, and want to receive it weekly via RSS Feed, click here: http://www.pgpmediation.com/feed/ or via FeedBurner email subscription, then enter your email address under the word “Subscribe” to the above right and click on the “Subscribe” button

MIRACLES

Tuesday, December 15th, 2009

       This week is Chanukah or the Festival of Lights. It commemorates the extraordinary feat of Judah Maccebee and his small band of fighters defeating a much, much larger Syrian army. In fact, they were outnumbered 100 to one.

       It seems that in about 333 BCE Alexander the Great conquered Syria, Egypt and Babylonia. Under his rule, the Jews were not treated too badly. However in 167 BCE, Syrian King Antiochus IV, a successor to Alexander the Great, began to openly persecute the Jews, including prohibiting them from studying Torah and desecrating the Second Temple.

       These actions caused a small band of Jews, led by Judah Maccabee to revolt. Although greatly outnumbered, Judah and his forces were able to defeat the very much larger Syrian army.

       With this victory, the Jews wanted to rededicate the Second Temple. To do so, among other things, required re-lighting the menorah which typically burns continuously. Judah and his men found only enough oil for the menorah to burn one day. However, they needed eight days to obtain a fresh supply of oil, and thus to keep the menorah lit continuously.
 

      As miracles would have it, that one day’s worth of oil lasted for eight days – long enough for the Maccabees to obtain a fresh supply of oil. To celebrate this miracle, the festival of Chanukah was declared.
   

       Miracles – this is an important concept both in the story of Chanukah and in the story of our everyday lives, especially during this holiday season. While our rationality tells us that “miracles do not exist” and we should not place false hopes in one occurring, our everyday lives tell us something different. Examples readily come to mind that miracles do happen – someone walks away from a horrendous crash without a scratch, another person is found alive after many days lost in the mountains or buried under an avalanche of snow or a third person wakes up from a coma after many years and so on. The news seems to be full of miracles that are not “supposed” to happen.

       I am dedicated to the peacemaking process because I believe in miracles. I witness people telling me that there is no way their case will settle, only to witness them signing a settlement agreement several hours later. Often times when I walk into a room to start a mediation, I am the only optimistic person in the room: I am the only one who believes in the miracle that this particular case will, indeed, settle. I witness the “impossible” happening with looks of doom and gloom turning into twinkles in the eye and smiles on the faces.

       In short, mediation can and does work miracles.

       So. . .believe in miracles. . . they do happen!

       Happy holidays!

       . . .Just something to think about.

If you enjoy this blog, and want to receive it weekly via RSS Feed, click here: http://www.pgpmediation.com/feed/ or via FeedBurner email subscription, then enter your email address under the word “Subscribe” to the above right and click on the “Subscribe” button

HAPPY THANKSGIVING

Tuesday, November 24th, 2009

       Thanksgiving is this Thursday, and I want to wish everyone a very happy Thanksgiving. While these may not be the “best of times,” they are certainly not the “worst of times.” ( Dickens, Charles, A Tale of Two Cities.) We still have much to be thankful for – our family, our friends, our health, and much, much more.

       If you take a moment and think of ten (10) things that you are thankful for, your list will fill up rather quickly. My list is easy; I am thankful for:  (1) a great husband, (2) his great family (with whom I will spend Thanksgiving), (3) my own brother and sister who have given me a lot of support over the years, especially this last year, (4) my mother who at 94 is still in good health, (5) the special time I had with my father while he was alive, (6) my wonderful friends who have given me support, (7)  my good health, (8) my job – I love being a mediator, (9) my dog, Argus, (who is my walking buddy – among other things!),  and (10) the future – it is bright and filled with hope and expectations!
 

     Happy Thanksgiving!
 

     Enjoy the day!
 

     Enjoy the long weekend!

   

       . . . Just something to think about!

If you enjoy this blog, and want to receive it weekly via RSS Feed, click here: http://www.pgpmediation.com/feed/ or via FeedBurner email subscription, then enter your email address under the word “Subscribe” to the above right and click on the “Subscribe” button

THE POWER OF AN APOLOGY

Friday, November 6th, 2009

       In my various mediation training classes, we have discussed the pros and cons of an apology; whether it should be given and if so, under what circumstances.

       From my own life experience, I know that apologies are important but I did not realize what a real difference they can make or how powerful they can be until today.
 

      Today, I mediated an emotionally difficult case. The plaintiff, of baby boomer age, rented an apartment in a secure building. The owner of the building employed a resident manager and handyman on the premises. According to plaintiff, although the handyman was often drunk at work, the manager did nothing about it and, in fact, often shared cocktails with him on her patio.
 

      One evening while plaintiff was walking to the apartment of one of her friends in the building, the handyman accosted her and began groping. Only with the assistance of one of her neighbors was plaintiff able to escape out of the corner into which the handyman had pinned her.

       This event traumatized plaintiff for which she sought counseling. While the counseling helped a great deal, it was obvious during the mediation that the emotional scars still existed.

       Prior to the mediation, I was inclined not  to hold a joint session. However, just prior to the start of mediation, I discussed this issue with defense counsel and the defendant’s representative. They stated that for purposes of the mediation, they were not contesting the events or otherwise taking issue in any way with what had occurred. I suggested a joint session so that they could make this acknowledgment directly to plaintiff.
 

      So with plaintiff and her counsel’s permission, we held a short joint session. We did not discuss the event itself but simply the parties’ perspectives on the matter.
 

      After plaintiff’s counsel finished, defense counsel spoke for a few moments noting that the issues were not being contested for purposes of the mediation. Then the representative of the landlord spoke. The first words he said were directed to plaintiff: “I apologize for what happened to you.” He continued, and the reactions of both plaintiff and her counsel were visible: their hardened demeanors softened considerably. Someone had not only acknowledged that the event had happened but had apologized for it.
 

      With this acknowledgement, the sole issue remaining was the amount of damages. After several rounds of negotiation, the parties agreed on a sum, and drafted and signed a settlement agreement. It was over. It did not take very long at all to resolve this matter.
 

      Afterward, plaintiff’s counsel told me that when she and her client walked in to the mediation, they had planned to take a hard line, ask for a large sum of money and not negotiate much below their initial demand. But, then, the landlord’s representative apologized. That apology changed everything. Up until the mediation, no one from the landlord, not even the resident manager (who was well aware of the event at the time it occurred) had acknowledged to her that the event had even occurred much less asked her if she was okay. Rather, the resident manager ignored the whole thing as if it had never occurred. The apology was the first  acknowledgment  that something bad, indeed, had happened to plaintiff which should never have happened. It thus became the most important part of the mediation. Because of that apology, plaintiff was willing to settle and in fact, settled for a much smaller sum of money than she had in mind when she walked into the mediation.
 

      An apology: it can be quite powerful!  

      Perhaps this is why, within recent years, thirty five (35) states and the District of Columbia have enacted statutes excluding expressions of sympathy after accidents as proof of liability while five (5) states have passed statutes requiring mandatory notification of adverse events to patients. These statutes were enacted mainly with medical malpractice in mind:  to assist the medical  community in its efforts to deter or reduce litigation and the amounts paid in settlement by being able to express sympathy without such expressions being considered admissions of liability. These statutes allow the medical professional to be human without exacting a large price for showing that humanity.

       As Patricia  A. Bronte explains in her article entitled ‘Reviving The Lost Art of Apology” published by the Section of Litigation of the American Bar Association:
        

        “Although the apology statutes were enacted within a relatively short    period, there are significant differences among them. All of them provide evidentiary protection for simple apologies (“I’m sorry you were hurt”); unfortunately, one study has shown this type of apology to be the least effective, and possibly counterproductive, in reducing litigation and settlement amounts. Five states have apology statutes that also protect partial apologies (“I made a mistake and I’m sorry”), but only Arizona’s statute explicitly protects full apologies (“I’m sorry, it was my fault you were hurt”). Statutes in 13 states clearly protect simple apologies and may also cover broader apologies.  “
 

      One example is the California statute.  California Evidence Code Section 1160 (california-evidence-code-section-1160) provides, in part,  that “…portion of statements, writings, or benevolent gestures expressing sympathy  or a general sense of benevolence relating to the pain, suffering or death of a person involved in an accident ….shall be inadmissible… A statement of fault , however…. shall not  be inadmissible….” 
 

      So, apologies are powerful and can go a long way to avoiding  litigation altogether or greatly reducing  the settlements often exacted to conclude it.  

       The next time are in a dispute, rather than letting it get out of hand,  think about simply saying” I apologize.”
 
       . . .Just  something to think about.

      If you have not done so already, do not forget to sign up for the Southern California Mediation Association’s 2009 SCMA Conference I am in charge of it and hope to see y’all there! 

     If you enjoy this blog, and want to receive it weekly via RSS Feed, click here: http://www.pgpmediation.com/feed/ or via FeedBurner email subscription, then enter your email address under the word “Subscribe” to the above right and click on the “Subscribe” button