Anger Management

Let us suppose that you are at a mediation or in some sort of negotiation and the other party has just said something that has gotten you so angry, you are ready to grab your belongings and storm out of the mediation/negotiation.

What should you do: give in to your feelings and storm out? Vent? Or, suppress them? It seems that none of the above is the appropriate response according to Psychology for Lawyers by Jennifer K. Robbennolt and Jean R. Sternlight (American Bar Association 2012)

Common sense tells us that in order to be an effective negotiator we must manage our emotions. We must exercise impulse control. We will get nowhere if we “fly off the handle” every time someone says something that gets us upset and thus distracts us from our goal: to settle the dispute.

So, do we vent? Not such a great idea! While it is a common belief that venting or blowing off steam will help calm us down or help us “get over it”, recent studies indicate just the opposite. That is, venting “…doesn’t help to moderate anger and may instead make things worse. …

[B]y focusing attention on and rehearsing the angry feelings, venting tends to keep those feelings alive, perpetuating and sometimes even intensifying them.” (Robbennot, Jennifer K. and Sternlight, Jean, R., Psychology for Lawyers (American Bar Association, 2012) at p. 58)

So, do we suppress the anger and the emotions that go with it, pretending that nothing has happened? Again, the answer is “no”. This strategy, too, has its difficulties:

Actively trying to monitor and suppress emotion once it occurs-the kind of thing we might do when trying to keep a poker face- requires a great deal of energy and cognitive capacity. Because efforts to suppress emotion take place after an emotion occurs, such efforts tend not to decrease the experience of emotion. Indeed, thought suppression tends to have ironic effects: the monitoring required to push thoughts out of our minds ends up highlighting those very thoughts….Efforts at suppression can sometimes decrease the degree to which emotion is expressed…..But the cognitive effort involved in concealing the emotion tends to result in increased emotion and decreased memory.” (Id. at 59.) (Emphases original.) (Footnotes omitted.)

So, what do we do? We take a break of some sort, either physically by going for a short walk, for coffee, to the restroom or down the hall just to chat to someone about something else. In short, we go “out to the balcony”. Or, we take a break mentally, by lightening up the discussion and talking about hobbies, vacation, pets, and other pleasant and engaging activities. We distract the mind and thus our attention away from what caused the anger and towards topics that create positive emotions, or “happy thoughts”. Or, we can seek to re-appraise the situation, by trying to put it into a different and more positive light. We can ask a question or two to find out exactly what is the cause and source of the emotion. Is it truly anger or fright or frustration? Knowing the source, we can then perhaps reframe the situation, by putting it into a different light, or perhaps by discussing it from the other person’s perspective. In short, we try to look at it differently, hopefully with a positive spin. (Id. at 59-61.)

So… the next time you are confronted with an emotional party, don’t throw up your hands and walk out; use one of the above options!

…Just something to think about.


If you would like to receive this blog automatically by e mail each week, please click on one of the following plugins/services:

and for the URL, type in my blog post address: and then type in your e mail address and click "submit".

Copyright 2018© Phyllis G. Pollack and, 2018. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Phyllis G. Pollack and with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

By |2017-05-13T07:28:01+00:00June 13th, 2014|Research|Comments Off on Anger Management

About the Author:

Phyllis Pollack
Phyllis G. Pollack, Esq. the principal of PGP Mediation (, has been a mediator in Los Angeles, California since 2000. She has conducted over 1700 mediations. As an attorney with more than 35 years experience, she utilizes her diverse background to resolve business, commercial, international trade, real estate, employment and lemon law disputes at both the state and federal trial and state appellate court levels. Currently, she is the in­coming chair of State Bar of California’s ADR Committee. She has served on the board of the California Dispute Resolution Council (CDRC) (2012­2013), is a past president and past treasurer of the SCMA Education Foundation (2011­2013) and a past president (2010) of the Southern California Mediation Association (SCMA). Ms. Pollack received her BA degree in sociology in 1973 from Newcomb College of Tulane University and her JD degree from Tulane University School of Law in 1977. She is an active member of both the Louisiana and California bars. Pollack believes that it is never too late to mediate a dispute and recommends mediation over litigation as it allows the parties to decide their own solutions.