Once again, another study has been published revealing that our memories are not accurate; they rewrite history incorporating present events.
Earlier this month, several different news articles including Northwestern University News and The Times of India reported a study published in the Journal of Neuroscience on February 5, 2014 by lead author Donna Jo Bridge, a postdoctoral fellow in medical social sciences at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine showing that “… the memory rewrites the past with current information, updating your recollections with new experiences….” (Id.) It is “…a wily time traveler, plucking fragments of the present and inserting them into the past.” ( Id. at The Times of India)
To conduct her study and thus reach her conclusions, Dr. Bridge had:
“… 17 men and women stud According to Dr. Bridge, this is the first study that shows specifically “… the exact point in time when …” incorrect information is imputed into our memories. (Id.) So, once again, in recalling the facts surrounding a dispute, beware; our memories are not what we think they are, and unknowingly, our memories will revise the history of what happened and/or how it happened. To resolve the dispute, it will help NOT to be adamant about the facts giving rise to it. Rather… focus on the future to get it settled. Our memories, while they may be time travelers to the past, have not yet become time travelers to the future. …. Just something to think about. If you would like to receive this blog automatically by e mail each week, please click on one of the following plugins/services: http://www.shootthebreeze.net/blogalert/index.php or ------------------------------------- If you would like to receive this blog automatically by e mail each week, please click on one of the following plugins/services:
Next, researchers asked participants to try to place the object in the original location but on a new background screen. Participants would always place the objects in an incorrect location.
Finally, participants were shown the object in three locations on the original screen and asked to choose the correct location. Their choices were: the location they originally saw the object, the location they placed it in part 2 or a brand new location.
“People always chose the location they picked in part 2,” Bridge said.
“This shows their original memory of the location has changed to reflect the location they recalled on the new background screen. Their memory has updated the information by inserting the new information into the old memory,” Bridge said. (Id.)
Do you like what you read?
and for the URL, type in my blog post address: http://www.pgpmediation.com/feed/ and then type in your e mail address and click "submit".
Copyright 2021 Phyllis G. Pollack and www.pgpmediation.com, 2021. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Phyllis G. Pollack and www.pgpmediation.com with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
