Once again, The Economist reported on another quirky study. In an article entitled “Tall dark and stable” in the psychology section of its July 14, 2012 edition, the author discusses how “wobbly furniture leads to a desire for emotional stability.”
Evidently, previous studies have shown that if one is given an icy drink at a party, that person will perceive that she is getting the cold shoulder from the other party goers. Similarly, giving a person a warm drink leads her to perceive a sense of warmth. Of greater interest, especially in this election year, are studies showing that if potential voters are sitting in chairs leaning slightly to the left, they, somehow, become more amenable to “liberal” or left leaning viewpoints!
The most recent study, which is the topic of this article, has to do with the effect of furniture on a person’s perceptions. David Kille, Amanda Forest and Joanne Wood at the University of Waterloo in Canada, had one-half of their volunteers sit in a slightly wobbly chair next to a slightly wobbly table while performing some task. The other one-half of the volunteers sat in non-wobbly chairs next to stable tables.
Those sitting in the wobbly chairs were then asked to judge the stability of the relationships of several celebrities, including President and Mrs. Obama, David and Victoria Beckham, Jay-Z and Beyonce and Johnny Depp and Vanessa Paradis. Using a scale of one to seven, the volunteers rated how likely the couple would break up within the next five years, in which “1” meant “extremely unlikely to dissolve”.
The researchers found that tinkering with the stability of the furniture effected the volunteer’s perception of stability:
Based on additional tasks given to those in the wobbly chairs, the researchers also found that these individuals “…valued stability in their own relationships more highly.”
This study presents some interesting thoughts in terms of negotiation and mediation. The most obvious is if wobbly furniture is used, the person sitting in it may well perceive her side of the dispute to be less secure than it really is, or, to the contrary, that the other party’s side of the dispute to be less secure than it really is and that her own side is much more stable. Or, it will cause the person to value stability more and so agree to a settlement providing it.
In a more general sense, this study reinforces the notion that our perception of reality and true “reality” are not the same. What we “perceive” to be true, often times, is not! Our brain can, indeed, play tricks on us, and we are even aware of it.
….. Just something to think about!
If you enjoy this blog, and want to receive it weekly via RSS Feed, click here: https://www.pgpmediation.com/feed/ or via FeedBurner email subscription, then enter your email address under the word “Subscribe” to the above right and click on the “Subscribe” button
Do you like what you read?
If you would like to receive this blog automatically by e mail each week, please click on one of the following plugins/services:
and for the URL, type in my blog post address: http://www.pgpmediation.com/feed/ and then type in your e mail address and click "submit".
Copyright 2021 Phyllis G. Pollack and www.pgpmediation.com, 2021. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Phyllis G. Pollack and www.pgpmediation.com with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.